Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "John D'Errico" <woodchips@rochester.rr.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Review of the new Symbolic toolbox included with MATLAB 2008b
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: John D'Errico (1-3LEW5R)
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <gg98lh$hnf$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <9fdfb300-b29b-4359-bdab-c5ffe53580f3@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <5d6d0768-5af0-427a-bc81-9538f2b70d10@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: "John D'Errico" <woodchips@rochester.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1227367921 18159 172.30.248.35 (22 Nov 2008 15:32:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 869215
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:502500


Vladimir Bondarenko <vb@cybertester.com> wrote in message <5d6d0768-5af0-427a-bc81-9538f2b70d10@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>...
> On Nov 22, 1:25=A0pm, "John D'Errico" <woodch...@rochester.rr.com>
> wrote:
> > Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com> wrote in message <31460dd1-8b4=
> 1-42d7-ba09-3fcad4da3...@w22g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>...
> > > On Nov 22, 1:09=3DA0am, Scott Seidman <namdiestt...@mindspring.com> wro=
> te:
> > > It is my sheer pleasure to introduce to the community glorious
> > > Dr. Scott H. Seidman (with Fortran roots, as he himself states)
> > > from University of Rochester.
> >
> > This is inappropriate and unprofessional, as are many
> > of your posts. I too will start to flag your stuff as spam.
> >
> > John
> 
> "I too will start to flag your stuff as spam."
> 
> I have the only question.
> 
> What you are going to do with the defects we calculate in MATLAB?
> 
> Flag them, too?

If you find a bug, then send it in as a bug report.
There is a place for those reports. Use it. Self
serving self promotion as you have done it is
spam however, and many others have been
recognizing it as such.

This treatment of Scott Seidman is unprofessional
and unacceptable however. You have only succeeded
in making yourself look bad by this post.

John