Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Brendan <brendandetracey@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: wavelets - image downsampling
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <5e93f91a-b440-42a9-abbe-b409bcc21f3a@z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <22af1099-c2eb-4eba-8e32-1d5721fe715d@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> 
	<ef564859-c3d9-45ed-a7a2-4407d18d734f@f3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> 
	<zP0Wk.24030$9Z6.10440@newsfe01.iad> <3cd77ef9-38fe-4d86-aede-31b8316d54b8@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 
	<gcgWk.24033$ev2.3725@newsfe12.iad> <7bba2fd8-0a08-40ed-8685-48314f6b0e8f@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.177.63.227
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1227576974 7101 127.0.0.1 (25 Nov 2008 01:36:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:36:14 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=142.177.63.227; 
	posting-account=B-TRNQoAAACbFTAQWrEB2ZKtNl2Jbw6S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; 
	.NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:502994


On Nov 23, 3:07=A0pm, NZTideMan <mul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 6:15=A0am, Walter Roberson <rober...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Brendan wrote:
> > > On Nov 22, 7:44 pm, Walter Roberson <rober...@hushmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Brendan wrote:
> > >>> On Nov 21, 7:36 pm, Brendan <brendandetra...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>> Was a simple question, but no one could be arsed to reply.
> > > Walter, I haven't a clue who you are and why you feel I was personall=
y
> > > asking you for anything.
>
> > But you expected *someone* to reply, and you were displeased that no-on=
e
> > did (on a weekend). If you weren't expecting *me* (personally) to reply=
,
> > then you must have been expecting some other specific person(s) to repl=
y
> > in that timeframe. Whom -specifically- were you expecting to reply and =
were
> > disappointed you by not doing so? By "specifically", I mean "Name the p=
erson
> > or persons". Was it John? Roger? Urs? Matt?
>
> > > Walter, I haven't a clue who you are and why you feel I was personall=
y
> > > asking you for anything.
>
> > The antonym of "no one" is, lacking context otherwise, "everyone". I am
> > part of "everyone", so when you assign blame that "no one" did this, yo=
u
> > include in that blame that *I* (personally) did not do that thing. Simi=
larly
> > for each other person here: your posting, as phrased, blamed each of us
> > *personally* for not having answered your question.
>
> > Each reply has to come from *someone* or some organization. If there is
> > that no specific person and no specific group with responsibility for r=
eplying,
> > there can be no displeasure that "no one could be arsed to reply"
> > (disappointment, perhaps, but not displeasure); as there -was- that dis=
pleasure,
> > then there must have been some identifiable person or entity that you f=
elt should
> > have replied but whom did not. Which person or entity was that?
>
> > --
> > .signature note: I am now avoiding replying to unclear or ambiguous pos=
tings.
> > Please review questions before posting them. Be specific. Use examples =
of what you mean,
> > of what you don't mean. Specify boundary conditions, and data classes a=
nd value
> > relationships -- what if we scrambled your data or used -Inf, NaN, or c=
omplex(rand,rand)?
>
> I saw Brendan's original post also. =A0From his question it was clear he
> had not RTFM. =A0I thought of telling him to do this, but refrained in a
> (rare) moment of diplomacy. =A0Brendan obviously did read the manual (as
> he should have before posting his silly question here) and
> subsequently responded to my non-posting by abusing me (and others).
> What should we do in future?
>
> May I suggest that an appropriate standard response to all future
> posts by Brendan should be: RTFM- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Must be from Invercargill.