Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: conv2 in R2008b very slow
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Xoran Technologies
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <gj2o8i$pul$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <gie3tb$qen$1@fred.mathworks.com> <3762e938-71a0-46a1-9cd4-3a56fd62fe0f@17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1230300242 26581 172.30.248.37 (26 Dec 2008 14:04:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1440443
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:508823


> Andreas:
> Interesting question.  here are my times:
> % in R2008b: 21.170 seconds.
> % in R2008a:   0.018 seconds.

Did you check quantitative agreement between the results of each?
I just can't believe it's possible to do a convolution that size in 0.018 sec.

But if so, what kind of machine are you using?