Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: conv2 in R2008b very slow
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Xoran Technologies
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <gj3b82$ci1$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <gie3tb$qen$1@fred.mathworks.com> <3762e938-71a0-46a1-9cd4-3a56fd62fe0f@17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <f4977e4c-f1a7-4ef2-b024-0a0f46eac45a@v4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1230319682 12865 172.30.248.37 (26 Dec 2008 19:28:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1440443
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:508838


ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst@mailinator.com> wrote in message <f4977e4c-f1a7-4ef2-b024-0a0f46eac45a@v4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>...
> Andreas:
> I tried an interesting experiment, after wondering if it had something
> to do with the routine checking to see if the kernel were separable
> and then trying to make some kind of optimization.  I replaced the
> kernel F with just an array of random numbers - the same size 23x180.

Andreas told me in an earlier post that size(F)=[180 180] not [23,180].

So now, I'm confused...