Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: flag as spam
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <4b2b39d9-3658-40c6-9e7f-574db4cffbde@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <glmqn0$br1$1@fred.mathworks.com> <96176571-a5bf-4390-8144-b82b35e61552@a39g2000prl.googlegroups.com> 
	<e90d3cad-0379-45e2-84a8-d0245d757818@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> 
	<gma61m$cm3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.186.70.56
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1233711918 24797 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2009 01:45:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:45:18 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.186.70.56; 
	posting-account=0rLUzAkAAABojYSRC64DkTbtiSCX77HH
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
	CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 
	3.5.21022),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:515859


On Feb 3, 2:31=A0pm, "Helen Chen" <helen.c...@mathworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. =A0We have reproduced this error and have e=
scalated the problem to MATLAB Central engineering.
>
> Thanks again,
> Helen
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
Helen:
I think you meant to reply to the other thread that mentioned that the
spam flagging capability was broken.  This thread just lamented the
fact that people read but don't flag, and lamented the fact that the
Mathworks newsreader doesn't have some nice features that Google has
such as putting at the bottom a list of threads (with links) that
you've recently posted to, or the ability to view a thread as a tree
structure so that you can really tell who replied to whom.  Those
would be nice value-added features (in addition to fixing the broken
spam flagger).
Thanks,
ImageAnalyst