Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!postnews.google.com!r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Nathan <ngreco32@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Compaq Visual Fortran 6.6
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <104ea13e-12f4-4cde-891e-df98798ffd25@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <fddc2b41-b0e9-4365-8ace-9456bc0043df@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> 
	<02d73886-94cc-4e0f-adfe-3d915ad63d2c@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.5.215.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245196829 6426 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2009 00:00:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.5.215.3; 
	posting-account=_KeVcAoAAAB7j3xn35ujaQ0BoQhuzwJP
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11) 
	Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:548128


On Jun 16, 4:57 pm, Mike <Sulfate...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 6:39 am, Nathan <ngrec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So, I know this is not supported in r2009a, but is there any way that
> > I can still use it? I don't want to go through the hassle of buying a
> > new compiler...
> > I'm on a 32-bit Windows XP system.
>
> > Any help would be appreciated, as I've been searching for an hour to
> > no avail.
> > (I only ask if I can still use it because I saw a batch script that
> > allowed users to use an Intel fortran compiler that is not normally
> > supported...)
>
> Suggest you post this one to comp.lang.fortran
> I use IVF now.  CVF is not maintained since a couple of years ago.
>
> Mike

Yeah, my mentor just gave me his copy of CVF to try to use with mex
files, but... it doesn't seem to like r2009a (I guess it was phased
out after r2007a or b)

I'll head over there now, thanks.