Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: measured boundary conditions with pde toolbox
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:36:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Maryland
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <h5cmv4$lbc$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-03-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1249500964 21868 172.30.248.38 (5 Aug 2009 19:36:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:36:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 812644
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:561117

Has anybody tried using the pde toolbox with boundary conditions taken from experimental measurements (ie, not a formula)? 

I see that assempde will take as its input either a boundary condition matrix or a boundary M-file, but both seem to give boundary conditions by specifying a simple formula (like x.^2+y.^2, from the example in the help files). I want to solve Poisson's equation using actual experimental data for the Neumann boundary conditions. It would seem reasonable to provide a matrix similar in form to the edge matrix "e", but containing local values of the Neumann boundary condition. Can it be done? 

Thanks in advance from a lowly experimentalist to all you pde gurus!