Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: 2D Phase Unwrapping with Minimum Cost Flow
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: FOGALE nanotech
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <h76ec9$buk$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <4070c98e-cbe0-40ca-9aab-9713f923c089@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>  <f1916d03-d7cc-4e19-a09d-97a8bedf29fe@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1251392713 12244 172.30.248.35 (27 Aug 2009 17:05:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 390839
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:566500


Finally: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25154

There are few details in Costantini's paper that sill escape me, notably the trick of converting integer optimization into a real one (integer solution is the real solution, but I believe the opposite is NOT true). Because of that, the "integration" step is not path-independent, and cause few stability issues during the numerical tests I have carried out.

It would be nice if someone here who fully grabs the method can shed a light.

Bruno