<pre>

Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!panix!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ali &lt;vahed.kami@gmail.com&gt;
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: tansig or logsig
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: &lt;86d4d465-3c62-4564-aa8a-1382203b3fae@l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com&gt;
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.225.244.38
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1257279775 27407 127.0.0.1 (3 Nov 2009 20:22:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.225.244.38; 
	posting-account=uDEqBgoAAABQU9LTN_sXIVHV__GkD0Kw
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) 
	Gecko/20091016 Firefox/3.5.4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:582159


hi guys,
Is it better to use 'logsig' or 'tansig' for transfer function of
output layer? is it important?


if we use tansig, can we use output data in [0 1] range (normalize)?
<pre>