Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Codistributed arrays performance
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Oregon
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <hd9m1i$oa3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <hd70vh$n62$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ytwws20dqco.fsf@uk-eellis-deb5-64.mathworks.co.uk> <ytw7htzeou2.fsf@uk-eellis-deb5-64.mathworks.co.uk>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1257790322 24899 172.30.248.35 (9 Nov 2009 18:12:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 990459
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:583607


Ah, I see, good to know. Is parfor then the route to better performance when applicable, or is the parallel toolbox really just for large data sets at this point?