Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Array indexing anomaly
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Xoran Technologies
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <hn6a8o$52s$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <hn192k$moc$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hn1q1t$1v2$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hn35c1$fb9$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hn3924$ful$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hn5mns$sd3$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hn5sqq$rg9$1@fred.mathworks.com> <MPG.2600725f676a1d4989ac1@news.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1268165720 5212 172.30.248.35 (9 Mar 2010 20:15:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:15:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1440443
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:615409

Loren Shure <loren.shure@mathworks.com> wrote in message <MPG.2600725f676a1d4989ac1@news.mathworks.com>...

> 
> The general rules are:
> 
> 1) retain the shape of the index UNLESS
> 2) you are indexing a vector with a vector, then retain orientation of 
> vector being indexed.
================

What we're curious about though, Loren, is what TMW's official rationale is for 2),
if different from what was discussed above. Why not retain the shape of the index universally?