From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Optmizaing a vector of 1-D functions
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <hplbrr$o0q$>
References: <hpl336$p7k$> <hpl46p$ffa$> <hpl4ui$s0u$> <hpl5t1$efe$> <hpl73t$5u3$> <hpl8ko$1ul$> <hplaai$9l$>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 1270756027 24602 (8 Apr 2010 19:47:07 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1187260
Xref: comp.soft-sys.matlab:624794

James Allison <> wrote in message <hplaai$9l$>...
> They are independent in the sense that it is possible to evaluate each 
> function independently, but the functions are coupled through the shared 
> optimization variable x. If Andrey is seeking a single optimal value of 
> x for the whole set of objective functions, the tradeoffs between the 
> objective functions will need to be considered. A value of x that is 
> best for one function may not be best for another. See my notes about 
> multi-objective optimization.
> -James
  That's not my understanding of Andrey's statement, James.  In his second article in this thread he wrote: "I mean, I've got a vector-function of one variable: F(x) = (f1(x), ..., fn(x))' where x is a real number. My problem is that I need to attain (x1, ..., xn)' where xj is a maximum of fj(x) over some interval (a,b)."

  In other words he is *not* "seeking a single optimal value of x for the whole set of objective functions", if we are to accept his statement in the second article.  Each of the n optimal values of x is to maximize the corresponding f in his vector of functions.

Roger Stafford