Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Error in MIN and MAX
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:50:35 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <hu17j7$2om$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <htrjji$34i$1@fred.mathworks.com> <hts20o$vt$1@fred.mathworks.com> 	<htt5bg$fli$1@fred.mathworks.com> <httm7f$14t$1@fred.mathworks.com> 	<httojr$f0t$1@news.eternal-september.org> <3923b2b7-b987-42bf-bcfa-6ed2c29ed13a@u20g2000pru.googlegroups.com> 	<htujp2$oh0$1@news.eternal-september.org> <c4d75620-d4e1-442f-9874-d57e22f9a49e@o39g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> 	<hu0abs$62n$1@news.eternal-september.org> <hu0bht$f6f$1@news.eternal-september.org> 	<7e2e56b5-3b23-4a10-ae74-3f2faa24f6b7@b21g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> 	<hu0ego$7go$1@news.eternal-september.org> <d161d22b-4e88-404b-8972-cecbdee29fa4@e21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> 	<hu0t3v$vl6$1@news.eternal-september.org> <3e191fb4-3c6b-4cb3-9627-ce14650bf5b3@q8g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="umnpDW4k4B+tUohAc6x/nw";
	logging-data="2838"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19U8l+ybfKtkT3EyTIQwdlw"
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
In-Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ThoAURBfZ6c3yIVkwqvGKthbKFY=
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:640990

Rune Allnor wrote:
> On 31 Mai, 19:51, dpb <n...@non.net> wrote:
>> Rune Allnor wrote:
>>> On 31 Mai, 15:42, dpb <n...@non.net> wrote:
>>>> I would simply ask that you just hold the vitriol on Fortran though;
>>> So why are you picking the fight in the first place?
>> I'm only responding when you go off on the diatribe -- there was a
>> little chuckle aside earlier in the thread just for grins but as the
>> smiley showed, that's all it was.
> 
> Was it?

You're saying it wasn't?  A :) indicated a certain amount of levity 
intended afaik...

>> You made a response that was reasoned to which I pointed out that
>> Fortran also has generic procedures.  In your response to that you then
>> went off on the rant.
> 
> What rant? ...
...

_WHAT_ rant....????  [Book-long rantings elided...]

Whoa, chill, dood!!!

Sorry if pointing out the interpretation of the sentence bugs you, but 
that's a little over the top methinks.

--