From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Error in MIN and MAX
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:50:35 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <hu17j7$2om$>
References: <htrjji$34i$> <hts20o$vt$> 	<htt5bg$fli$> <httm7f$14t$> 	<httojr$f0t$> <> 	<htujp2$oh0$> <> 	<hu0abs$62n$> <hu0bht$f6f$> 	<> 	<hu0ego$7go$> <> 	<hu0t3v$vl6$> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info:; posting-host="umnpDW4k4B+tUohAc6x/nw";
	logging-data="2838"; mail-complaints-to="";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19U8l+ybfKtkT3EyTIQwdlw"
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20100228)
In-Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ThoAURBfZ6c3yIVkwqvGKthbKFY=
Xref: comp.soft-sys.matlab:640990

Rune Allnor wrote:
> On 31 Mai, 19:51, dpb <> wrote:
>> Rune Allnor wrote:
>>> On 31 Mai, 15:42, dpb <> wrote:
>>>> I would simply ask that you just hold the vitriol on Fortran though;
>>> So why are you picking the fight in the first place?
>> I'm only responding when you go off on the diatribe -- there was a
>> little chuckle aside earlier in the thread just for grins but as the
>> smiley showed, that's all it was.
> Was it?

You're saying it wasn't?  A :) indicated a certain amount of levity 
intended afaik...

>> You made a response that was reasoned to which I pointed out that
>> Fortran also has generic procedures.  In your response to that you then
>> went off on the rant.
> What rant? ...

_WHAT_ rant....????  [Book-long rantings elided...]

Whoa, chill, dood!!!

Sorry if pointing out the interpretation of the sentence bugs you, but 
that's a little over the top methinks.