Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: How to avoid for loops in 3 vector function.
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 06:00:22 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <iptedl$eab$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <ipmluu$l21$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ipph4t$8g9$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ippm7h$8au$1@fred.mathworks.com> <iprc6c$67r$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ipsjrq$ebg$1@fred.mathworks.com> <iptdis$4b3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: www-06-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1304575222 14667 172.30.248.38 (5 May 2011 06:00:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 06:00:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1187260
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:725301

"Roger Stafford" wrote in message <iptdis$4b3$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
>   .....  Using other values than v = 0 could be determined from this one curve by an opposite shift of that amount along the b scale followed by, say, interpolation, rather than going through the massive computation again. ........
- - - - - - - -
  Where I said "an opposite shift of that amount" I meant to say "shifts of those amounts".

Roger Stafford