Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Find Minimum Values of Matrix without MIN or For loops
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ecole Centrale de Nantes
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <iqcb2j$c8p$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>
References: <ipih48$enm$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ipkkvg$5ti$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ipnf3o$9g3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: www-06-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: newscl01ah.mathworks.com 1305063315 12569 172.30.248.38 (10 May 2011 21:35:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 2838257
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:726111


>   I still claim it might be a risky thing to hand in a solution to a teacher of greater complexity than that needed by 'min'.  I would fear their grade score would be awarded in inverse proportion to the complexity used.
> 
> Roger Stafford


Well, if I were to ask to my students such an exercise (min over all columns) without loops and without the min function, I would not grade on efficiency. The problem itself is twisted. Imho, the only benefit from such exercise is to challenge the student creativity. In a sense the teacher is asking the students to surprise him.

A.