From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Matlab code error
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <iub05i$r81$>
References: <>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 1309213682 27905 (27 Jun 2011 22:28:02 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:28:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1187260
Xref: comp.soft-sys.matlab:733938

Nathan <> wrote in message <>...
> On Friday, June 24, 2011 11:07:04 AM UTC-7, Roger Stafford wrote:
> >   Nathan, when you respond to a thread you should include your response in the thread itself rather than starting a brand new thread, as you have done here.  Otherwise people will not be able to understand what you are talking about.
> > Roger Stafford
> Hm. I guess google group's "new" view doesn't work correctly with TMW newsgroup?
> The post that I was responding to, which you also happened to respond to, resides here:
> I KNOW not to start new threads when responding to a prior thread. I've been posting here for two years (not entirely consistently, however). (I hope this response doesn't post a new thread, but if it does, I am sorry. I am using google groups and something must have changed.)
> -Nathan
- - - - - - - -
  I'm sorry about that, Nathan.  After posting that admonition Friday, I got to wondering if something like that might be true.

  Yes, on the Matlab Newsreader, the two threads appeared separately at numbers 309700 and 309706.  This thread I am replying to now is also separate at number 309795.  Yet the Google thread at:

contains the contents of both 309700 and 309706, so something is haywire somewhere between Google Groups and Matlab Newsreader.

Roger Stafford