From: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: CSSM activity
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: FOGALE nanotech
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <j2l8ua$o7g$>
References: <j2hord$j9u$>
Reply-To: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 1313744650 24816 (19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 390839
Xref: comp.soft-sys.matlab:740529

"Jan Simon" wrote in message <j2hord$j9u$>...

> This question is explicitely thought for Bruno, who looked in Answers for some weeks but left it afterwards.  Do you have suggestions for improvements?

I prefer CSSM for various reasons:
- Linear organization by posting time is easier to follow, and by a large margin.
- Do not have distracting gadgets such as comments, voting, reputation.
- I find the discussions turned out here are more computation oriented, which I prefer [ to the reputation oriented on the other ;-)].

Two things I really like in Answers editor is specific code formatting and possibility to edit his/her own post. But that's about it.

Since I do not have enough time to share in both boards, my vote goes to CSSM which - between the two - has incidentally less reputation .