Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: CSSM activity
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: FOGALE nanotech
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <j2l8ua$o7g$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>
References: <j2hord$j9u$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: "Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry>
NNTP-Posting-Host: www-04-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: newscl01ah.mathworks.com 1313744650 24816 172.30.248.35 (19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 390839
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:740529

"Jan Simon" wrote in message <j2hord$j9u$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...

> This question is explicitely thought for Bruno, who looked in Answers for some weeks but left it afterwards.  Do you have suggestions for improvements?

I prefer CSSM for various reasons:
- Linear organization by posting time is easier to follow, and by a large margin.
- Do not have distracting gadgets such as comments, voting, reputation.
- I find the discussions turned out here are more computation oriented, which I prefer [ to the reputation oriented on the other ;-)].

Two things I really like in Answers editor is specific code formatting and possibility to edit his/her own post. But that's about it.

Since I do not have enough time to share in both boards, my vote goes to CSSM which - between the two - has incidentally less reputation .

Bruno