Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Greg Heath" <heath@alumni.brown.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: patternnet vs newff
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <kaucs5$4ul$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>
References: <kammao$48q$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: "Greg Heath" <heath@alumni.brown.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: www-06-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: newscl01ah.mathworks.com 1355986629 5077 172.30.248.38 (20 Dec 2012 06:57:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 2929937
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:785116

"Barbara" wrote in message <kammao$48q$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> Hi
> 
> I am trying to update some of my MATLAB scripts accordimg to the new nnet-Toolbox  functions, but I cannot get some things to work. For example:
> 
> old version: 
___SNIP
>   ans =      0.5498    0.5548    0.5548    0.5596 
___SNIP
> new version
> ans =     0.7700    0.7749    0.7749    0.7798
 
> The outputs of these two nets, which I thought should be identical are different. I do understand the output of the newff-net, but I don't see how it comes to the results in case of patternnet. 
> 
> Any help would be very much appreciated

As stated in my previous post, there have been many changes between those versions. Some are readily apparent and some are subtle.

It may be best to just make sure that you know how to use the new functions. Then after they have been tested on data, you can see how they compare with the older versions.

Hope this helps.

Greg