From: "Lorenzo Quadri" <>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: very large array
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Universit&#224; statale di Milano
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <kqe34j$6it$>
References: <kq9hdf$bsa$> <kq9khs$kvi$> <kq9n1f$smu$> <kq9nib$12h$> <kq9r5n$21t$> <kqakig$i31$> <kqaumh$4ko$> <kqbcna$93q$> <kqbdh7$amk$> <kqcjrg$gmd$> <kqctlb$kas$>
Reply-To: "Lorenzo Quadri" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: 1372229587 6749 (26 Jun 2013 06:53:07 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 4392211
Xref: comp.soft-sys.matlab:798210

dpb <> wrote in message <kqctlb$kas$>...

> I'm surprised it's that fast...but I've an old, slow 32-big machine by 
> today's standards...
> --

I believe that it's an operation that requiring much less memory, I've 16 gb phisical mem
and the problems start if you have to use the virtual memory. I noticed that the processor time is never stressed so much (and Ml does not seem to use the multicore efficiently)