MATLAB Newsgroup

Hi all,

I've been using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT, spectrogram function) to examine the time course of specific frequency amplitudes over time.

How confident can I be that the power values reflect the signal in the intended time bin and not adjacent bins (i.e., can I work out if there is smearing of frequency components across time bins)? For a given frequency, to what extent are the amplitude estimates for a time bin dependent on the strength of that frequency in adjacent bins? If this is a problem, does the Hamming window reduce the influence of the frequency signal from adjacent bins?

Finally, I've read quite a few forum entries written by people struggling with STFT. I found the following link particularly helpful:

http://note.sonots.com/SciSoftware/STFT.html

Thanks, :-)

David

...

STFT settings:

data = x;

wind = 1575;

noverlap = 875;

nfft = wind;

fs.new = 1000;

[S, F, T, P] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new, 'yaxis');

"David Painter" <david.ross.painter@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3bj3k$ivc$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> Hi all,

>

> I've been using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT, spectrogram function) to examine the time course of specific frequency amplitudes over time.

>

> How confident can I be that the power values reflect the signal in the intended time bin and not adjacent bins (i.e., can I work out if there is smearing of frequency components across time bins)? For a given frequency, to what extent are the amplitude estimates for a time bin dependent on the strength of that frequency in adjacent bins? If this is a problem, does the Hamming window reduce the influence of the frequency signal from adjacent bins?

>

> Finally, I've read quite a few forum entries written by people struggling with STFT. I found the following link particularly helpful:

>

> http://note.sonots.com/SciSoftware/STFT.html

>

> Thanks, :-)

>

> David

>

> ...

>

> STFT settings:

>

> data = x;

> wind = 1575;

> noverlap = 875;

> nfft = wind;

> fs.new = 1000;

>

> [S, F, T, P] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new, 'yaxis');

Hi David, Your time resolution is the difference between the window length and the number of samples that you overlap your windows, (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new in your case. You can see this by:

plot(diff(T)); % equal to 0.700 (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new. Your frequency resolution is fs.new/wind in each of your windows. Again, you can see this with

plot(diff(F));

In the example below I create two signals one with a periodic component (200 Hz) in the first time window [0,1.57] seconds (although it only lasts for the first .700 seconds) and one that has a periodic component in part of both the first and second windows. You see within these windows, you have no time resolution.

t = linspace(0,10,10000);

t = t(:);

x = zeros(1e4,1);

y = x;

x(1:700) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:700));

y(100:1200) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:1101));

x = x +0.2*randn(size(t));

y = y +0.2*randn(size(t));

[Sx, F, T, Px] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

[Sy, F, T, Py] = spectrogram(y, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

% Note

subplot(211)

plot(F,Px(:,1));

title('P_x');

subplot(212);

plot(F,Px(:,2));

% versus

figure;

subplot(211);

plot(F,Py(:,1));

title('P_y');

subplot(212);

plot(F,Py(:,2));

Hope that helps,

Wayne

"Wayne King" <wmkingty@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3bvh4$4nn$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> "David Painter" <david.ross.painter@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3bj3k$ivc$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> > Hi all,

> >

> > I've been using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT, spectrogram function) to examine the time course of specific frequency amplitudes over time.

> >

> > How confident can I be that the power values reflect the signal in the intended time bin and not adjacent bins (i.e., can I work out if there is smearing of frequency components across time bins)? For a given frequency, to what extent are the amplitude estimates for a time bin dependent on the strength of that frequency in adjacent bins? If this is a problem, does the Hamming window reduce the influence of the frequency signal from adjacent bins?

> >

> > Finally, I've read quite a few forum entries written by people struggling with STFT. I found the following link particularly helpful:

> >

> > http://note.sonots.com/SciSoftware/STFT.html

> >

> > Thanks, :-)

> >

> > David

> >

> > ...

> >

> > STFT settings:

> >

> > data = x;

> > wind = 1575;

> > noverlap = 875;

> > nfft = wind;

> > fs.new = 1000;

> >

> > [S, F, T, P] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new, 'yaxis');

>

> Hi David, Your time resolution is the difference between the window length and the number of samples that you overlap your windows, (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new in your case. You can see this by:

>

> plot(diff(T)); % equal to 0.700 (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new. Your frequency resolution is fs.new/wind in each of your windows. Again, you can see this with

>

> plot(diff(F));

>

> In the example below I create two signals one with a periodic component (200 Hz) in the first time window [0,1.57] seconds (although it only lasts for the first .700 seconds) and one that has a periodic component in part of both the first and second windows. You see within these windows, you have no time resolution.

>

> t = linspace(0,10,10000);

> t = t(:);

> x = zeros(1e4,1);

> y = x;

> x(1:700) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:700));

> y(100:1200) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:1101));

> x = x +0.2*randn(size(t));

> y = y +0.2*randn(size(t));

>

> [Sx, F, T, Px] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

> [Sy, F, T, Py] = spectrogram(y, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

> % Note

> subplot(211)

> plot(F,Px(:,1));

> title('P_x');

> subplot(212);

> plot(F,Px(:,2));

>

> % versus

> figure;

> subplot(211);

> plot(F,Py(:,1));

> title('P_y');

> subplot(212);

> plot(F,Py(:,2));

>

> Hope that helps,

> Wayne

Hi Wayne,

That was really helpful! So the short-time Fourier transform will pick of frequencies within the fft analysis window, though the results returned create a misleading impression that the fft has (in effect) only been applied to the returned time bins.

In the following example there is a 100 Hz signal during the first bin (0-700 ms) and a 200 Hz signal during the second bin (701-1400 ms). The first fft is run on data from 1-1575 ms, and the second is run on data from 701-2276 ms. Consequently, the 100 Hz signal is present only during the first time segment, and the 200 Hz signal is present in both time segments. The answer to my original question is then that the frequency spectrum in any one bin includes information from adjacent times.

Seems like a series of ffts (with zero-padding for Hz resolution and a Hamming window for the padding) on binned data will be a better solution for me since these will not be affected by frequency signals at adjacent times.

Thanks,

David

win = 1575;

noverlap = 875;

nfft = 1575;

fs = 1000;

t = linspace(0,10,10000);

t = t(:);

x = zeros(1e4,1);

x(1:700) = cos( 2*pi*100*t(1:700) );

x(701:1400) = cos( 2*pi*200*t(701:1400) );

spectrogram(x, win, noverlap, nfft, fs)

"David Painter" <david.ross.painter@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3fs1j$jpe$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> "Wayne King" <wmkingty@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3bvh4$4nn$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> > "David Painter" <david.ross.painter@gmail.com> wrote in message <i3bj3k$ivc$1@fred.mathworks.com>...

> > > Hi all,

> > >

> > > I've been using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT, spectrogram function) to examine the time course of specific frequency amplitudes over time.

> > >

> > > How confident can I be that the power values reflect the signal in the intended time bin and not adjacent bins (i.e., can I work out if there is smearing of frequency components across time bins)? For a given frequency, to what extent are the amplitude estimates for a time bin dependent on the strength of that frequency in adjacent bins? If this is a problem, does the Hamming window reduce the influence of the frequency signal from adjacent bins?

> > >

> > > Finally, I've read quite a few forum entries written by people struggling with STFT. I found the following link particularly helpful:

> > >

> > > http://note.sonots.com/SciSoftware/STFT.html

> > >

> > > Thanks, :-)

> > >

> > > David

> > >

> > > ...

> > >

> > > STFT settings:

> > >

> > > data = x;

> > > wind = 1575;

> > > noverlap = 875;

> > > nfft = wind;

> > > fs.new = 1000;

> > >

> > > [S, F, T, P] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new, 'yaxis');

> >

> > Hi David, Your time resolution is the difference between the window length and the number of samples that you overlap your windows, (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new in your case. You can see this by:

> >

> > plot(diff(T)); % equal to 0.700 (wind-noverlap)*1/fs.new. Your frequency resolution is fs.new/wind in each of your windows. Again, you can see this with

> >

> > plot(diff(F));

> >

> > In the example below I create two signals one with a periodic component (200 Hz) in the first time window [0,1.57] seconds (although it only lasts for the first .700 seconds) and one that has a periodic component in part of both the first and second windows. You see within these windows, you have no time resolution.

> >

> > t = linspace(0,10,10000);

> > t = t(:);

> > x = zeros(1e4,1);

> > y = x;

> > x(1:700) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:700));

> > y(100:1200) = cos(2*pi*200*t(1:1101));

> > x = x +0.2*randn(size(t));

> > y = y +0.2*randn(size(t));

> >

> > [Sx, F, T, Px] = spectrogram(x, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

> > [Sy, F, T, Py] = spectrogram(y, wind, noverlap, nfft, fs.new);

> > % Note

> > subplot(211)

> > plot(F,Px(:,1));

> > title('P_x');

> > subplot(212);

> > plot(F,Px(:,2));

> >

> > % versus

> > figure;

> > subplot(211);

> > plot(F,Py(:,1));

> > title('P_y');

> > subplot(212);

> > plot(F,Py(:,2));

> >

> > Hope that helps,

> > Wayne

>

> Hi Wayne,

>

> That was really helpful! So the short-time Fourier transform will pick of frequencies within the fft analysis window, though the results returned create a misleading impression that the fft has (in effect) only been applied to the returned time bins.

>

> In the following example there is a 100 Hz signal during the first bin (0-700 ms) and a 200 Hz signal during the second bin (701-1400 ms). The first fft is run on data from 1-1575 ms, and the second is run on data from 701-2276 ms. Consequently, the 100 Hz signal is present only during the first time segment, and the 200 Hz signal is present in both time segments. The answer to my original question is then that the frequency spectrum in any one bin includes information from adjacent times.

>

> Seems like a series of ffts (with zero-padding for Hz resolution and a Hamming window for the padding) on binned data will be a better solution for me since these will not be affected by frequency signals at adjacent times.

>

> Thanks,

>

> David

>

> win = 1575;

> noverlap = 875;

> nfft = 1575;

> fs = 1000;

>

> t = linspace(0,10,10000);

> t = t(:);

>

> x = zeros(1e4,1);

>

> x(1:700) = cos( 2*pi*100*t(1:700) );

> x(701:1400) = cos( 2*pi*200*t(701:1400) );

>

> spectrogram(x, win, noverlap, nfft, fs)

Hi David, Glad it's making more sense. I think the easiest way to think about it is whatever your window length, the Fourier transform sums (integrates) over all time within that window. Therefore you lose all time information within that window. You can see from your example:

[S, F, T, P] = spectrogram(x, win, noverlap, nfft, fs);

plot(F,P(:,1));

that both 100 and 200 Hz are evident in your first window of 1.57 seconds, but we don't get the sense that 100 Hz occurred in the first 1/2 (roughly) of that window and 200 Hz occurred in the 2nd half. That information is lost to us because of the window length. Of course, you can reduce your window length to improve your time resolution, but then you lose frequency resolution, because the spacing between your Fourier transform bins is inversely proportional to the window length. The danger here is that two "closely" spaced periodic components get resolved as only one.

And so it goes... the dilemma that is time-frequency analysis :)

Wayne

You can think of your watch list as threads that you have bookmarked.

You can add tags, authors, threads, and even search results to your watch list. This way you can easily keep track of topics that you're interested in. To view your watch list, click on the "My Newsreader" link.

To add items to your watch list, click the "add to watch list" link at the bottom of any page.

To add search criteria to your watch list, search for the desired term in the search box. Click on the "Add this search to my watch list" link on the search results page.

You can also add a tag to your watch list by searching for the tag with the directive "tag:tag_name" where tag_name is the name of the tag you would like to watch.

To add an author to your watch list, go to the author's profile page and click on the "Add this author to my watch list" link at the top of the page. You can also add an author to your watch list by going to a thread that the author has posted to and clicking on the "Add this author to my watch list" link. You will be notified whenever the author makes a post.

To add a thread to your watch list, go to the thread page and click the "Add this thread to my watch list" link at the top of the page.

A tag is like a keyword or category label associated with each thread. Tags make it easier for you to find threads of interest.

Anyone can tag a thread. Tags are public and visible to everyone.

The newsgroups are a worldwide forum that is open to everyone. Newsgroups are used to discuss a huge range of topics, make announcements, and trade files.

Discussions are threaded, or grouped in a way that allows you to read a posted message and all of its replies in chronological order. This makes it easy to follow the thread of the conversation, and to see what’s already been said before you post your own reply or make a new posting.

Newsgroup content is distributed by servers hosted by various organizations on the Internet. Messages are exchanged and managed using open-standard protocols. No single entity “owns” the newsgroups.

There are thousands of newsgroups, each addressing a single topic or area of interest. The MATLAB Central Newsreader posts and displays messages in the comp.soft-sys.matlab newsgroup.

**MATLAB Central**

You can use the integrated newsreader at the MATLAB Central website to read and post messages in this newsgroup. MATLAB Central is hosted by MathWorks.

Messages posted through the MATLAB Central Newsreader are seen by everyone using the newsgroups, regardless of how they access the newsgroups. There are several advantages to using MATLAB Central.

**One Account**

Your MATLAB Central account is tied to your MathWorks Account for easy access.

**Use the Email Address of Your Choice**

The MATLAB Central Newsreader allows you to define an alternative email address as your posting address, avoiding clutter in your primary mailbox and reducing spam.

**Spam Control**

Most newsgroup spam is filtered out by the MATLAB Central Newsreader.

**Tagging**

Messages can be tagged with a relevant label by any signed-in user. Tags can be used as keywords to find particular files of interest, or as a way to categorize your bookmarked postings. You may choose to allow others to view your tags, and you can view or search others’ tags as well as those of the community at large. Tagging provides a way to see both the big trends and the smaller, more obscure ideas and applications.

**Watch lists**

Setting up watch lists allows you to be notified of updates made to postings selected by author, thread, or any search variable. Your watch list notifications can be sent by email (daily digest or immediate), displayed in My Newsreader, or sent via RSS feed.

- Use a newsreader through your school, employer, or internet service provider
- Pay for newsgroup access from a commercial provider
- Use Google Groups
- Mathforum.org provides a newsreader with access to the comp.soft sys.matlab newsgroup
- Run your own server. For typical instructions, see: http://www.slyck.com/ng.php?page=2