|
"Think two, count blue." <roberson@hushmail.com> wrote in message <iiq188$m72$1@nrc-news.nrc.ca>...
> On 11-02-07 04:49 PM, pietro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several symbolic equations like this one:
> >
> > (bs*md*s^3 + (bd*bs + ks*md)*s^2 + (bd*ks + bs*kd)*s + kd*ks)/(md*ms*s^4 +
> > (bd*md + bd*ms + bs*md)*s^3 + (bd*bs + kd*md + kd*ms + ks*md)*s^2 + (bd*ks +
> > bs*kd)*s + kd*ks)
> >
> > and I would like to rearrange this with respect these new variables:
> >
> > w1=sqrt(k1/m1);
> > w2=sqrt(k2/m2);
> > mu=w2/w1;
> > cs1=bd/(2*md*w2)
> > cs2=bs/(2*ms*w1)
> >
> >
> > how can I get this?
> >
> > Any suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Pietro
>
> Rewrite in terms of replacing a known variable with another variable, and
> re-order the substitutions so that no variable is re-used after it has been
> substituted. In particular, mu=w2/w1 can be rewritten as w2=mu*w1 or as w1 =
> w2/mu but either way one of w1 or w2 will be replaced, but w1 and w2 are
> needed for the later substitutions. Thus, leave the rewrite in terms of mu to
> last.
>
> I think this might be valid MuPad syntax:
>
> Revised_Expression = subs(Expression, k1, w1^2*m1, k2, w2^2*m2, bd,
> 2*cs1*md*w2, bs, 2*cs2*ms*w1, w2, w1*mu);
>
>
> By the way: you might want to factor() the numerator before you do the
> substitutions.
Hi Think,
yesterday was really layte when I typed the post and I have written in the right way the new variables. Anyway these are the right ones:
ws=sqrt(ks/ms);
wd=sqrt(kd/md);
mu=md/ms;
csd=bd/(2*md*wd);
css=bs/(2*ms*ws);
ftun=wd/ws;
As you suggested my I have tried in this way:
subs(tfs,[ks, kd bd bs md ms],[ws^2*ms, wd^2*md ,2*css*ms*ws,2*csd*md*wd,mu*ms ftun^2*md*ks/kd])
ans =
((ms*ws^2 + 2*csd*md*s*wd)*(ms*mu*s^2 + 2*css*ms*ws*s + md*wd^2))/(ms^2*mu*s^2*ws^2 + 2*csd*md^2*s*wd^3 + 2*css*ms^2*s*ws^3 + md*ms*wd^2*ws^2 + 2*css*ms^2*mu*s^3*ws + md*ms*mu*s^2*wd^2 + 2*csd*md*ms*mu*s^3*wd + (ftun^2*ks*md^2*s^2*wd^2)/kd + (ftun^2*ks*md*ms*mu*s^4)/kd + 4*csd*css*md*ms*s^2*wd*ws + (2*css*ftun^2*ks*md*ms*s^3*ws)/kd)
The result is far away the optimal. Simple function doesn't affect the result. what is wrong in my code?
Thanks
Pietro
|