MATLAB Answers

Adding k discrete functions together in a "for" loop

3 views (last 30 days)
Hello,
I'm trying to create a loop that creates individual discrete sine waves from a vector of sampled frequencies (locs), then adds those values together to create a single combined waveform.
My code worked well symbolically:
syms tau
locs = [440 529 630] %example frequencies
combined = 0;
for k = 1:length(locs)
figure
hold on
wave(k) = sin(2*pi*locs(k)*tau); %generate sin wave for each sampled frequency
fplot(sin(2*pi*locs(k)*tau),[0 0.01])
hold off
combined = combined + wave(k); %add each generated sin wave to the previous one
end
figure
fplot(combined, [0 0.01])
But I am having trouble converting it to a discrete form. I get an error that says the indices on the left do not match the indices on the right, which I assume means that I am trying to put a 132300 element array (the sin function of t) into a 1x3 array (wave(k)).
t = 0:1/44100:3;
locs = [440 529 630] %example frequencies
combined = 0;
for k = 1:length(locs)
figure
hold on
wave(k) = sin(2*pi*locs(k)*t); %generate sin wave for each sampled frequency
stem(sin(2*pi*locs(k)*t),[0 441])
hold off
combined = combined + wave(k); %add each generated sin wave to the previous one
end
figure
stem(combined, [0 441])
Is there a better way to handle/store each of the generated sin waves so they can be added together in a discrete form?

  0 Comments

Sign in to comment.

Accepted Answer

Vladimir Sovkov
Vladimir Sovkov on 1 Dec 2019
If you do not need the "wave" contents for a further use, just drop out (k) from all its entries.
If you need it for a further use, initialize it as
wave=zeros(3,numel(t));
before the loop and address it as wave(k,:) within the loop.
Commands "stem" are definitely incorrect. If you want to see plots of the dependences on t, they should look something like stem(t,combined) or plot(t,combined), etc. However, the t range in the second version (0,3) is much wider than the one of the first version (0,0.01): consequently, such a graph will show much (hugely) more oscillations--you will probably see nothing but a unifromly painted square.
I do not see any need in the "nold on" and "hold off" commands in the both version.

  0 Comments

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (0)

Sign in to answer this question.

Products


Release

R2019b