Why doesn’t my figure look correct? Is there something wrong with it?
Show older comments
In stochastic processes, the Brownian motion should appear throughout the entire function, but in my figure, it only appears at the top. What could be causing this mistake? I consulted an expert in stochastic processes, and they confirmed that this is an error. How can I fix it? i am looking for a plot like that

% Parameters
n = 1;
A = 1; % Amplitude
B = 1; % Width parameter of soliton
v = 1; % Velocity of soliton
alpha = 1; % Nonlinearity parameter
beta = 0.1; % Dispersion parameter
gamma = 0.05; % Noise intensity for multiplicative noise
% Grid for xi and time
xi = linspace(-20, 20, 2000); % Spatial range in transformed coordinates
t = linspace(-20, 20, 2000); % Time range
dt = t(2) - t(1); % Time step
% Generate Wiener process (increments) for time
W = cumsum(sqrt(dt) * randn(size(t))); % Wiener process for each time step
W = gamma * W; % Scale Wiener process by gamma
% Define initial soliton profile (deterministic solution)
u_deterministic = abs(((tanh(0.192e3 ./ 0.35e2 .* t' + xi) - 0.1e1) .^ (0.1e1 ./ 0.4e1)) .* exp(i * (-0.3e1 .* xi - 0.8e1 * t' + (3 .* W' ))));
% Ensure u_deterministic has the correct dimensions (time x space)
if size(u_deterministic, 1) ~= length(t) || size(u_deterministic, 2) ~= length(xi)
error('Mismatch in dimensions of u_deterministic. Check calculations.');
end
% Initialize storage for the stochastic solution
u_stochastic = zeros(length(t), length(xi));
% Time evolution
for n = 1:length(t)
% Apply the Wiener noise factor at time step n
noise_factor = 1 + W(n);
% Update solution with multiplicative noise
u_stochastic(n, :) = u_deterministic(n, :) * noise_factor;
end
% Plot the 3D surface of the stochastic Kudryashov soliton
figure;
surfc(xi, t, u_stochastic, 'EdgeColor', 'none');
xlabel('Transformed Space (\xi)');
ylabel('Time (t)');
zlabel('Amplitude (u)');
title('Stochastic Kudryashov Soliton Solution with Multiplicative Noise (Wiener Process)');
colormap jet;
color
4 Comments
Mathieu NOE
on 17 Dec 2024
hello
maybe I'm lucky (because I am by no means an expert in your field) but I guess I found the article from where you extracted the so called S4 solution plot :

seems to me that what you have plotted ressembles to the S1 solution - so are we talking about the same thing ?

salim
on 17 Dec 2024
Mathieu NOE
on 17 Dec 2024
hello again @salim saeed
no , un fortunately this is not a topic I a working on... sorry . As I said I had some luck finding the paper from which you extracted the figure , but I just see that between the two plots there are differences (the publication mention S1 plot and S4 plot , so I wonder if you are comparing the same type of plots).
also I didn't recognize the equations you used in the code vs the one in the publication but maybe you have cretaed your plots from another reference - it could be beneficial to share as well the references you used.
salim
on 17 Dec 2024
Answers (0)
Categories
Find more on Mathematics in Help Center and File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!