Yet another TEXTSCAN question...

Asked by Serge on 27 May 2018

Latest activity Commented on by Serge on 29 May 2018

1 view (last 30 days)

Example string:

s = ['"1","2","3"' 10 '"","2","3"' 10 '"1","","3"' 10 '"1","2",""' 10 '"","",""' 10]
s =
    '"1","2","3"
     "","2","3"
     "1","","3"
     "1","2",""
     "","",""
     '

I want to extract columns as either cellstring or as numbers, using textscan (because it is fast). I can cheat and do this with the following:

t=textscan(strrep(s,'"',''),'%f%f%f','Delimiter',','); [t{:}] %as number
ans =
     1     2     3
   NaN     2     3
     1   NaN     3
     1     2   NaN
   NaN   NaN   NaN
t=textscan(strrep(s,'"',''),'%s%s%s','Delimiter',','); [t{:}] %as string
ans =
  5×3 cell array
    {'1'     }    {'2'     }    {'3'     }
    {0×0 char}    {'2'     }    {'3'     }
    {'1'     }    {0×0 char}    {'3'     }
    {'1'     }    {'2'     }    {0×0 char}
    {0×0 char}    {0×0 char}    {0×0 char}

But how to do it without strrep? so as to operate on file_id directly..

I have spent hours, thinking I've almost got it, 1 million permutations later no joy.. :'( :'( :'(

2 Comments

Rik on 27 May 2018

Is strrep so much slower that it is not feasible?

Serge on 28 May 2018

Performance wise this is ok because textscan is doing 90% of the work, but it does requires the whole file to be read in first, even if say you only want one of 50 fields in the data. Using textscan directly on the file_id would have been neater. It looks like it is not possible with this file format...

2 Answers

Link

Answer by dpb on 27 May 2018

Edited by dpb on 27 May 2018

Let textscan do the equivalent strrep for you...

>> fmt1=repmat('%f',1,3);
>> t=cell2mat(textscan(s,fmt1,'delim',',','collectout',1,'whitespace','"'))
t =
     1     2     3
   NaN     2     3
     1   NaN     3
     1     2   NaN
   NaN   NaN   NaN
>> fmt2=repmat('%s',1,3);
>> t=textscan(s,fmt2,'delim',',','collectout',1,'whitespace','"')
t =
  1×1 cell array
    {5×3 cell}
>> t{:}
ans =
  5×3 cell array
    {'1"'    }    {'2"'    }    {'3"'    }
    {0×0 char}    {'2"'    }    {'3"'    }
    {'1"'    }    {0×0 char}    {'3"'    }
    {'1"'    }    {'2"'    }    {0×0 char}
    {0×0 char}    {0×0 char}    {0×0 char}
>>

7 Comments

Show 4 older comments

Stephen Cobeldick on 28 May 2018

Serge's "Answer" moved here:

Sorry, forgot to say that a file contains a mixture of string and value columns. So I am afraid that does now work.

dpb on 28 May 2018

+1 Stephen; forgot about '%q'.

Serge, it works to reproduce your suggested/requested output for the strings case; the alternative posted works for numeric.

Serge on 28 May 2018

Perhaps this is a better example:

s = ['"","",""' 10 '"a","2",""' 10 '"a","","c"' 10 '"","2","c"' 10]
s =
    '"","",""
     "a","2",""
     "a","","c"
     "","2","c"
     '

Where: any value can be any length or empty, any column may be numeric, which is described by file header.

I almost got it working with this ugly thing:

t = textscan(s,'%q%f%s','delim',{'","' '"'})

ISSUE: first column cannot be numeric, it must be string, and format for first column must be %q, for subsequent string columns must use %s.

Would love to see other suggestions.. Because this is ugly and has issues I'll stay with the strrep cheat.

Link

Answer by Jeremy Hughes on 29 May 2018

If the numbers are always surrounded by double-quotes, try this,

t = textscan(s,'"%f""%f""%f"','Delimiter',',')

or,

t = textscan(s,'%f%f%f', 'Delimiter',',','Whitespace',' \t"')

There's a lot of knobs in textscan. If you have a file with this kind of data, I suggest:

opts = detectImportOptions(filename)
t = readtable(filename)

HTH,

Jeremy

1 Comment

Serge on 29 May 2018

Thank you Jeremy,

I think I have tried every permutation under the sun :/

This one fails when a value is empty: ,"",

t = textscan(s,'"%f""%f""%f"','Delimiter',',')

And this one grabs " at the end of strings, eg 'a"':

s = ['"a","","c"' 10 '"","2","c"' 10]
t = textscan(s,'%s%f%q','Delimiter',',','Whitespace',' \t"')

dbp said it looks like a BUG IN TEXTSCAN and I am inclined to agree.

You are now following this question

Serge (view profile)