While I've not tried to delve into the bowels, the prepackaged exponential model probably has a customized technique to estimate the starting values whereas (I think) the custom model just starts with a random guess.
NB: The sign of a and b between the two is reversed; to get the overall negative value, one has to be negative and larger than the other; where the initial guess starts will determine which is which as the iterations continue.
While the result looks decent for the latter NB the two coefficients a and c
a = -4E12 +/-3E20(!!!)
or the CV (coefficient of variation) for the coefficient is 7.5E7 -- a highly imprecise value.
For data that looks like the above, why would you choose the exp2 model and not exp1, however? No sign of there being a competing exponential in there that I can see.
You can also select a web site from the following list
How to Get Best Site Performance
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.