Does r=uint64(308436464205151562) make sense? It seems like the argument to uint64 is a double precision number, so you have already lost the precision you are trying to gain by using uint64.
r=uint64(308436464205151562) outputs for uint64(r) 308436464205151562. However, r=308436464205151562 outputs for uint64(r) 308436464205151552. A very small loss in precision, but still a loss. The Challenge set has some numbers that use all the paint if full precision math was used. If residual paint was required as an output then full precision is needed. For solutions using p=p-2*r-1 the errors in r and p may cause issues.
Very novel input parameter adjustment to allow direct solution.
That's Muller's method which is more computationally realiable than Bhaskaracharya's.
Nice bisecting search method and anonymous function for clean appearance.
3423 Solvers
477 Solvers
Matrix with different incremental runs
257 Solvers
381 Solvers
619 Solvers
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!