Editor's Note: This file was selected as MATLAB Central Pick of the Week
EXPAND(A,SZ), for array A and vector SZ replicates each element of A by SZ. The results are tiled into an array in the same order as the elements of A, so that the result is size: size(A).*SZ.
Therefore the number of elements of SZ must equal the number of dimensions of A, or in MATLAB syntax:
length(size(A))==length(SZ)
must be true.
The result will have the same number of dimensions as does A.
There is no restriction on the number of dimensions for input A.
Examples:
>> A = [1 2;3 4]
A =
1 2
3 4
>> expand(A,[2 1])
ans =
1 2
1 2
3 4
3 4
>> expand(A,[2 2])
ans =
1 1 2 2
1 1 2 2
3 3 4 4
3 3 4 4
Please email me if bugs are found in the code. Thanks.
Matt Fig (2021). EXPAND (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24536-expand), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved .
Inspired by: REPLICATE
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!Create scripts with code, output, and formatted text in a single executable document.
I've been using EXPAND for a number of years, and it's part of my open source software FeynDyn for numerically calculating Feynman integrals.
Regarding Yair Altman's comment below:
Have the speed and memory of EXPAND been retested now?
I'm wondering if I should scrap EXPAND from my software.
Also, MATLAB has it's own EXPAND in the Symbolic Toolbox for expanding expressions like (x+y)^2.
Thanks for the input.
Now that R2013b has finally incorporated Bruno's efficient implementation (FEX 24499) into the built-in KRON function, I expect the balance of performance and memory to shift in favor of KRON. Of course, expand will continue to be better for anyone still using R2013a or earlier.
For additional alternative implementations, see http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/326075
Another reason I bypassed kron is illustrated here:
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc229/spamanon/tester_output-2.png
Urs, I think you are correct about mentioning kron in the see also.
just like jos, i also felt at first that this - admittedly sleek engine - was more or less a KRON clone; but then your timing convinced me that there was clearly more to it...
however, i think you should at least mention KRON in a
see also:
statement...
us
Hello Jos,
There are a couple of reasons I bypassed kron. The main reason is that expand, even with error checking etc., is faster on my machine(s):
A = reshape(randperm(24),6,4);
SZ = [300,400];
tic
T = expand(A,SZ);
toc %Elapsed time is 0.043622 seconds.
tic
T2 = kron(A,ones(SZ));
toc %Elapsed time is 0.082535 seconds.
For
A = reshape(randperm(144),18,8);
SZ = [300,400];
expand is .25 vs. .78 seconds for kron. 2007b win xp.
expand also works for your second example.
Thanks.
Why not simply
kron(A,eyes(SZ))
or, for non-numerical arrays,
X = {'a' 'b' ; [1:3] []}
X(kron(reshape(1:numel(X),size(X)), ones(2,3)))
%ans =
% 'a' 'a' 'a' 'b' 'b' 'b'
% 'a' 'a' 'a' 'b' 'b' 'b'
% [1x3 double] [1x3 double] [1x3 double] [] [] []
% [1x3 double] [1x3 double] [1x3 double] [] [] []
It can be expanded to the ND case using reshape etc ...
Good help though!