"Column Vector" XTick labels

3 views (last 30 days)
Mark Stone
Mark Stone on 28 May 2022
Commented: dpb on 30 May 2022
Consider the following plot:
plot(0:2,2-(0:2),'*'),xticks([0 1 2]),xticklabels({'(0,2)','(1,1}','(2,0)'})
I want to keep the "plot" as is, just change the labeling for the x axis ticks., so that each xtick label would be a column vector instead of a pair in parentheses. For instance,
0 1 2
2 1 0
instead of
(0,2) (1,1) (2,0)
Is this possible?

Accepted Answer

Voss
Voss on 28 May 2022
Edited: Voss on 28 May 2022
plot(0:2,2-(0:2),'*')
xticks([0 1 2])
xticklabels(sprintfc('%d\\newline%d',[0 2 1 1 2 0]))
  5 Comments
Voss
Voss on 28 May 2022
@dpb: I also tried \n first. It seemed that MATLAB used \n to separate the labels:
xticks() % leaving xticks at its default, for the time being
ans = 1×6
0 0.2000 0.4000 0.6000 0.8000 1.0000
xtl = sprintfc('%d\n%d',[0 2 1 1 2 0])
xtl = 1×3 cell array
{'0↵2'} {'1↵1'} {'2↵0'}
xticklabels(xtl)
Then I remembered another answer I had seen recently, about emboldening a single xticklabel (an answer of yours, incidentally):
There, sending \bf to the TeX interpreter solved the problem, so I tried to do the same thing here but with a line break. I had to look up how to make a line break in TeX, and what I found was this question:
which suggested that \newline was the way to go, so I tried it out and it seemed to work.
dpb
dpb on 30 May 2022
I guess I had never looked that up before, or if had done in the past, had certainly forgotten it.
The undocumented sprintfc is handy, too; that replaces the functionality I got with the loop and explicit cast. I hadn't stumbled over it before, either...

Sign in to comment.

More Answers (1)

dpb
dpb on 28 May 2022
Edited: dpb on 28 May 2022
I don't think so with the tick labels(*), but you can write them with text as
v1=[0:2];v2=[2:-1:0];
for i=1:3
xtl(i)=cellstr(sprintf('%d\n%d',v1(i),v2(i)));
end
xticklabels([])
text(xticks,repmat(-0.02,1,3),xtl,'VerticalAlignment',"top")
(*) When try to write string with embedded \n, the internals of xticklabels converts each to another string element so you end up with it thinking 2X the labels than number of ticks.
  2 Comments
Mark Stone
Mark Stone on 28 May 2022
Thanks. Is the repmat'd value -0.02 a "magic" number which always works to make the alignment come out well? Does what that number "should be" depend on the numerical values in v1 and v2?
dpb
dpb on 28 May 2022
Yeah, it is "magic" number as shown -- because the default coordinates for text are in 'data' units. This can be set to be 'normalized' which are the units of the axes and then a fixed offset from the lower position number is the invariant way to place.

Sign in to comment.

Products

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!