creating a temporary variable

Asked by Ingo on 3 Jan 2012

Accepted Answer by Walter Roberson

31 views (last 30 days)

This is a quick question. Compare

A = sparse(...); B = A - C;

and

B = sparse(...) - C;

Memory-wise spoken, is there a difference? Will the second one use less memory because I'm not creating a variable?

0 Comments

2 Answers

Link

Answer by Walter Roberson on 3 Jan 2012

Accepted Answer

There will be very little memory difference. For a transient value, MATLAB creates everything about the storage except the symbol table entry with the name and a pointer to the descriptor.

3 Comments

Ingo on 3 Jan 2012

My thinking was, that in the first solution Matlab actually creates two matrices (A and B), while in the second solution it handles both matrices parallel, only using memory for one matrix. Since I don't know Matlab's inner workings, I can't tell, though.

Walter Roberson on 3 Jan 2012

As far as I know, MATLAB only uses memory "in-place" when the same variable appears in a function call and in the assignment of the results from that call. There was another condition as well but I have forgotten it now.

I'm thinking it might have been Rick Rossom who listed the conditions in a comment, but it might have been someone else at MathWorks.

Ingo on 3 Jan 2012

Alright then.

Additionally, I tested this whole thing (only "quick'n'dirty", though) and I couldn't notice any memory difference.

Thanks!

Link

Answer by Nicholas on 3 Jan 2012

Did you try using tic toc?

 tic
A = sparse(magic(3));
B = A - C;
disp(toc)
tic
B = sparse(magic(3)) - C;
disp(toc)

In any case the result depends on matrix dimensions and matrix initialization. If you want to improve memory management you should initialize a matrix/vector first and than try to improve matrix calculation.

3 Comments

Ingo on 3 Jan 2012

I'm not looking for time differences, but for differences in the amount of memory (RAM) needed.

Greetings

Nicholas on 3 Jan 2012

If you are interested so deeply in memory allocation you should write your code in C and do not use matlab.

You can not see under the hood in matlab..

Ingo on 3 Jan 2012

Yeah, I know that writing it in C would be more efficient. The advantage of Matlab, however, is the simple fact, that I don't have to implement all the mathematical stuff.

My code is pretty fast, I believe. If there was any way to make it faster in Matlab, I'd do it. So I'm looking for ways. But if not, that's okay, too – creating, processing and plotting 100.000 data points on my several years old laptop within seconds or minutes sounds more than acceptable to me. ;)

You are now following this question

Ingo (view profile)