Does Matlab C/C++ Graphics Library for compiler 2.0/3.0, support mix language (.c, .m) ?

Runtime error when tried to generate a stand alone executable, when combining Matlab module with graphics and .c routine.

Amazingly the the following compile command did generate an executable but it did not include the graphics library call as part of the run time.

I used the following command to get the executable:

mcc -B sgl -t -W lib:Pkgout <Main.m> <module1.m> <module2.c>

And I get the fololowing error when I ran Main.exe

error. function call "figure" requires graphics library , use "-B sgl" switch when compiling

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I tried various combination of the mcc command but no luck.

Matalb R11, R13

[Walter Roberson]

Did you happen to try

mcc -t -W lib:Pkgout <Main.m> <module1.m> <module2.c> -B sgl 

[Shubham Kashyap]

I agree with Walter answer. Did you use correct flags (e.g. –B sgl for graphics if R13) to compile?

[Walter Roberson]

The trick I was referring to was not using -B sgl in itself, as the usr already had that at the beginning of the command. Instead, the trick I was referring to was to put the -B sgl towards the end of the line. The order of specifying libraries can be important as often there is no look-ahead: if library A calls upon library B then the order on the command line can need to be A then B, with B then A failing (depending on the details of how the linker works.)

[Siamak Mohebbi]

Hi

mcc -t -W lib:Pkgout <Main.m> <module1.m> <module2.c> -B sgl

Yes, various combination of complier command were tried including what was suggested. The above syntax is flat out not accepted by the compiler (mcc).

FYI: Since posying the question an alternate approcah was implemented by partitioning the application and calling them separately. Effectively by passing this difficiency.