As opposed to Matlab CONV, CONV2, and CONVN implemented as straight forward sliding sums, CONVNFFT uses Fourier transform (FT) convolution theorem, i.e. FT of the convolution is equal to the product of the FTs of the input functions.
In 1-D, the complexity is O((na+nb)*log(na+nb)), where na/nb are respectively the lengths of A and B.
Optional arguments to control the dimension(s) along which convolution is carried out.
Slightly less accurate than sliding sum convolution.
Good usage recommendation:
In 1D, this function is faster than CONV for nA, nB > 1000.
In 2D, this function is faster than CONV2 for nA, nB > 20.
In 3D, this function is faster than CONVN for nA, nB > 5.
Bruno Luong (2020). FFT-based convolution (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/24504-fft-based-convolution), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved .
I'm running Matlab 2017a. It installs successfully compiling with MinGW, but crashes matlab when I try to run it.
Thanks Bruno, it works and still very helpful.
Vijendhar, I don't have access to MacOS.
You can replace the inplaceprod(A,B) with
A = A.*B;
it works with more memory required.
Hello Bruno. I used convnfft function in my office computer, Windows 2010, MATLAB 2015a. It worked very well and I saved a lot of time. Thanks for great work.
Unfortunately, I get error with my PC, MacOS, MATLAB 2018a. It keeps saying an error,
Undefined function or variable 'inplaceprod'.
Error in convnfft (line 166)
Any help? I did some research and got to know that the MEX file should be compiled for the mexmaci64 platform to run on Apple Mac. Is it possible for you to provide MEX file of inplaceprod in mexmaci64 platform? I'm actually new to Matlab, please correct my question if I'm wrong and provide a solution for the error. Thanks
Thank you for updating the mex call. This is a wonderful tool! The folks at Mathworks would be wise to implement FFT-based math options in their core convolution functions.
Bruno, up until MATLAB R2017a, this function works fine, but it breaks when running in MATLAB 2018a. Any ideas? No errors get thrown, but image A just seems to get "post" zero padded with a border with same dimensions as B.
Sorry, I'm obviously doing something wrong.
First, this is way slower than convn (but given the size of the matrices it shouldn't be). And second I'm getting different answers.
stimImg=randn(i, i, 240);
tmp1 = convnfft(stimImg, hemo(:), 'valid');
tmp2 = convn(stimImg, hemo(:), 'valid');
Excellent function Bruno. I have a suggestion. Would it be possible to do the convolution with NaNs? Also, sometimes when using the 'same' argument for the shape it would be interesting to add NaNs to the edges instead of zeros. This would eliminate artifacts one gets near the edges of the convolution.
This is what I experimented with the code.
>> tic,A = convnfft(rand(300,300,300), ones(5,5,5), 'same');toc
Elapsed time is 8.061082 seconds.
>> tic,A = convn(rand(300,300,300), ones(5,5,5), 'same');toc
Elapsed time is 2.085360 seconds.
I am running 2014a on a machine with 192Gb of RAM and 20 cores. I am trying to convolute two vectors, one with 3,060,663 elements, the other with 693. The built-in conv took 0.06 seconds. convnfft filled the memory and then crashed the machine.
I downloaded your code and tried to install launching the installation function from Matlab command line. I use a Mac running Maverick (10.9.4)
I got the following error that I am copying in the following.
I verified that clang is installed:
f4230:~ mauede$ which clang
I would greatly appreciate your help.Thank you so much.
-> mexopts.sh sourced from directory (DIR = $MATLAB/bin)
FILE = /Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin/mexopts.sh
-> MATLAB = /Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app
-> CC = xcrun -sdk macosx10.7 clang
-> CC flags:
CFLAGS = -fno-common -arch x86_64 -isysroot -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -fexceptions
CDEBUGFLAGS = -g
COPTIMFLAGS = -O2 -DNDEBUG
CLIBS = -L/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin/maci64 -lmx -lmex -lmat -lstdc++
-> CXX = xcrun -sdk macosx10.7 clang++
-> CXX flags:
CXXFLAGS = -fno-common -fexceptions -arch x86_64 -isysroot -mmacosx-version-min=10.7
CXXDEBUGFLAGS = -g
CXXOPTIMFLAGS = -O2 -DNDEBUG
CXXLIBS = -L/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin/maci64 -lmx -lmex -lmat -lstdc++
-> FC = gfortran
-> FC flags:
FFLAGS = -fexceptions -m64 -fbackslash
FDEBUGFLAGS = -g
FOPTIMFLAGS = -O
FLIBS = -L/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/bin/maci64 -lmx -lmex -lmat -L -lgfortran -L -lgfortranbegin
-> LD = xcrun -sdk macosx10.7 clang
-> Link flags:
LDFLAGS = -arch x86_64 -Wl,-syslibroot, -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -bundle -Wl,-exported_symbols_list,/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/extern/lib/maci64/mexFunction.map
LDDEBUGFLAGS = -g
LDOPTIMFLAGS = -O
LDEXTENSION = .mexmaci64
-> LDCXX =
-> Link flags:
-> xcrun -sdk macosx10.7 clang -c -I/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/extern/include -I/Applications/MATLAB_R2013b.app/simulink/include -DMATLAB_MEX_FILE -fno-common -arch x86_64 -isysroot -mmacosx-version-min=10.7 -fexceptions -O2 -DNDEBUG "inplaceprod.c"
xcodebuild: error: SDK "macosx10.7" cannot be located.
xcrun: error: unable to find utility "clang", not a developer tool or in PATH
mex: compile of ' "inplaceprod.c"' failed.
Unable to complete successfully.
Error in convnfft_install (line 17)
This function is indeed faster than CONV, but as soon as I attempted to use it on larger data sets, Matlab produced an 'out of memory' error, whereas CONV can cope just fine with the same datasets (albeit taking longer).
FYI if I run the 'memory' command my output is as follows:
Maximum possible array: 11862 MB (1.244e+10 bytes) *
Memory available for all arrays: 11862 MB (1.244e+10 bytes) *
Memory used by MATLAB: 820 MB (8.597e+08 bytes)
Physical Memory (RAM): 8011 MB (8.400e+09 bytes)
So the problem definitely isn't my hardware
Excellent job! Nicely documented and elegant code and to the point!
Works much faster than conv2 for full case, and also faster than conv2 with option 'valid', which misteriously makes conv2 35x faster with a 500x500 matrix with a 400x400 one (makes me suspect that conv2 + 'valid' does not just extract the mid part but saves computations).
Young, You must change the directory where convfft is installed (including the c code) to install it.
First of all, thanks for the nice job. Unfortunately, I'm having problem with running it. When I try to run convnfft_install, it keeps saying
C:\PROGRA~1\MATLAB\R2013B\BIN\MEX.PL: Error: 'inplaceprod.c' not found.
Error in convnfft_install (line 17)
Do you have any suggestion?
Bruno, sorry, I forgot to mention that I used 2012b. Moreover, speed difference might depend on inputs and I'm lucky with the inputs I use?
Petr, I just test with 2012a, the recommendation stands.
Hi Bruno, as for usage recommendations, are they updated for new MATLAB releases? In case of my application for 2D, both nA and nB are greater than 20 (about 200*300 each). However, MATLAB conv2 takes almost the same time as convnfft (even slightly faster).
The GPU acceleration depends on user's hardware. It is impossible to give reliable number without what is your computer setup. A test I run long ago shows an acceleration between 3-5 times.
Sorry, Luc -> Luke
Excellent work Bruno. Many thanks.
Quick question. How much faster it would be with the GPU jacket enabled?
I try GPUmat using fft2 to programme similar code but it turns out to be slower.
I am thinking to get MATLAB Parallel Computing Toolbox to run the GPU if it is a lot faster.
I hope it is.
Could you please give me some idea? Say
A = rand(1000,1000);
B = rand(1000,1000);
tic;C=convnfft(A, B, 'same', [1, 2],'false');toc
given me> 0.213153 seconds without GPU
tic;C=convnfft(A, B, 'same', [1, 2],'true');toc
Hello again. Apparently it's Matlab filter2 function fault: "Given a matrix X and a two-dimensional FIR filter h, filter2 rotates your filter matrix 180 degrees to create a convolution kernel."
Why the rotation is needed? hack knows...
Hi Bruno. Excellent contribution and elegant code.
A few small comments:
1) The speed up is smaller then the one you state- as conv is optimized both by both Мatlab and by CPU vendor (Intel in my case).
2) The convolution shift in your (and btw mine) is different form the one resulting from filter2 function. Try running the following code:
convFFT=convnfft(img, filt, 'same', [1, 2]);
subplot(1, 2, 1);
title('FFT based convolution');
subplot(1, 2, 2);
title('Matlab regular convolution');
Moreover, when I checked the result form this code, there are some different between this and convn for two 3d matrix, the 2 input matrix are both positive.
the result from this code has negative values while convn does not.
May be the inplace times is no longer necessary for recent Matlab.
I remember implement that from a user request.
Thanks for the useful feedback.
Hi Bruno, are you sure your inplaceprod() is (still) useful?
I'm pretty sure, MATLAB does A=A.*B in-place itself. I just compared my memory usage for very large A/B with both methods and there was no difference.
This post is from 2007: http://blogs.mathworks.com/loren/2007/03/22/in-place-operations-on-data/
In a heterogeneous environment, it is useful to avoid mex code for such small tasks. If you are a non-privileged user on a compute server it is really a mess when compiling fails due to compiler version, libraries or whatever.
A minor notice is that (i)fftn is faster than for-loops around 1D (i)fft calls. At least as long as the input and output are of the same size. So I got at least a little speed gain by replacing
A = ifft(A,,dim);
A = ifftn( A );
for the MATLAB ifft case.
Thank you for the code!
I think this says it all...
>> tic;C = convn(Vs,Vs);toc;
Elapsed time is 473.103412 seconds.
>> tic;C2 = convnfft(Vs,Vs);toc;
Elapsed time is 1.351315 seconds.
Thanks so much for this!
Well written (IMHO).
Awesome function! My code runs 60x faster now (thanks to your GPU support).
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!Start Hunting!