## Choosing a method for nonlinear data-fitting to find parameters

### Nik (view profile)

on 31 Jul 2017
Latest activity Commented on by Nik

on 1 Aug 2017

### Matt J (view profile)

I'm currently trying to fit nonlinear experimental data to find two parameters. Using lsqcurvefit has been working well about 90% of the time, but I wanted to try to improve that. I have found other methods for fitting data, but I'm confused about the differences between them, and how to choose one. I tried using MultiStart in addition to lsqcurvefit, but that did not seem to improve the results. I also tried lsqnonlin without any luck. Do you have any recommendations about other methods/options to try? I have access to the majority of the toolboxes. Some people were discussing the use of robustfit, but I was confused about the implementation of that. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

on 31 Jul 2017
Edited by Matt J

### Matt J (view profile)

on 31 Jul 2017

If lsqcurvefit is failing and your objective function is legal (differentiable, etc...), then it must be that you are deriving a bad initial guess in those failure cases. Since it is only a 2 parameter search, you should be able to derive a good initial guess of the optimum just by evaluating the least squares cost function on some coarse grid and either plotting them as a 2D surface or taking the minimum over the samples.

Matt J

### Matt J (view profile)

on 1 Aug 2017
lsqcurvefit looks for parameters x that minimize
cost(x) = norm(F(x,xdata)-ydata).^2
You could plot cost(x) as a 2D surface and look for where the minimum approximately occurs. Also, now that we see your model equation, I agree with John that fminspleas would work well for this problem: you only have one non-linear parameter, B.
John D'Errico

### John D'Errico (view profile)

on 1 Aug 2017
fminspleas will be more efficient here, as well as more robust, because it need to work with only the one nonlinear parameter, B. That means A does not need a starting value, nor is it really solved for in an iterative sense. This also makes the problem more robust, because the parameter search is now done in a 1-dimensional search space, instead of the 2-d space of the original problem.
You can even take advantage of the model form to use the expm1 function, since expm1(X)=exp(X)-1. This can be more accurate for some values of X. I doubt it is important here though.
funlist = {@(B,xdata) -expm1(-xdata*B)};
Nik

### Nik (view profile)

on 1 Aug 2017
Thank you both so much! I tried using fminspleas, and I did notice a little improvement.

### Yahya Zakaria mohamed (view profile)

on 1 Aug 2017

You can use the APP for curve fitting.
<<
>>
It fits very well with about 95% I think nothing more You will get.You can generate code from the app and modify it as You wish.

Nik

### Nik (view profile)

on 1 Aug 2017
Thank you, I didn't realize that code can be generated from the tool.